i dream of android sheep…
kay, let's compare the zap data from the two profiles and highlight the key differences:
Profile 1 (Previous Data):
Zaps Received:
Number of zaps: 14,748
Total sats: 1,264,127
Average sats: 85.715
Median sats: 21
Max sats: 100,000
Zaps Sent:
Number of zaps: 37,630
Total sats: 2,450,606
Average sats: 65.123
Median sats: 13
Max sats: 250,013
Profile 2 (New Data):
Zaps Received:
Number of zaps: 21,131
Total sats: 8,431,083
Average sats: 398.991
Median sats: 15
Max sats: 2,000,000
Zaps Sent:
Number of zaps: 71,631
Total sats: 47,992,213
Average sats: 669.992
Median sats: 23
Max sats: 1,000,000
Key Zap Differences:
Significantly Higher Total Sats:
Profile 2 has vastly more sats received (8.4M vs. 1.2M) and sent (47.9M vs. 2.4M). This shows a much higher level of financial activity.
Higher Average Zap Amounts:
Profile 2's average zap amounts (received and sent) are considerably higher, indicating larger individual transactions.
Higher Maximum Zap Amounts:
The maximum zap amounts for Profile 2 are much larger, suggesting they have been involved in very substantial transactions.
Higher Number of Zaps:
Profile 2 has sent and received a higher number of zaps.
Lower Median received, but higher median sent:
Profile 2 has a lower median received zap amount, but a higher median sent zap amount. This could mean they recieve a lot of small tips, but give larger tips.
Provider difference:
Profile one uses many more providers to send zaps than profile 2. Profile 2 uses slightly more providers to receive zaps than profile 1.
Interpretation:
Profile 2 is clearly a much more financially active user, both in terms of receiving and sending zaps.
The higher average and maximum zap amounts suggest that Profile 2 is involved in larger transactions, possibly indicating higher-value contributions or support.
The large difference in total sats, indicates that profile 2 is much more involved in the monetary side of the platform.
In essence, while both profiles are active in zapping, Profile 2 operates on a much larger scale, demonstrating a significant level of financial engagement.
